Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €51.75 vs €577.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900KF - €0.32 vs €2.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in God of War than Celeron G3900 - 202 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Buy for €577 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |