Buy on Amazon
€51.08
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1387 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - €51.08 vs €546.05
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75696 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3930K Prozessor (3,2GHz, 12MB-Cache, Sockel 2011)
Buy for €546.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
95.87458745874588%
Multi-Core
992
33.50219520432287%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
