Buy on Amazon
€47.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8350 - 227 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than FX-8350 - €47.66 vs €155.88
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-8350 CPU verwendet 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 4 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
