Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-10400F vs Celeron G1620

Core i5-10400F vs Celeron G1620: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10400F

2.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Intel Core i5-10400F (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box

Buy for 93 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 44 minutes ago

vs

Intel Celeron G1620

2.7 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155

Buy for 20.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 43 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10400F

2.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Intel Core i5-10400F (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box

Buy for 93 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 44 minutes ago

vs

Intel Celeron G1620

2.7 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155

Buy for 20.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 43 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F

  • Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1620 - 202 vs 199 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620

  • Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €20.16 vs €93.0
  • Up to 78% better value when playing Control than Core i5-10400F - €0.1 vs €0.46 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Control.
Control

Control

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Core i5-10400F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

202

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.46/FPS

21%

Price, €

€93

21%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10400F (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box

Buy for 93 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 44 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

199

98%

Value, €/FPS

€0.1/FPS

100%

Price, €

€20.16

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155

Buy for 20.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 43 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Core i5-10400F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Core i5-10400F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1438

100%

Multi-Core

5751

100%

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

409

28%

Multi-Core

723

12%

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F

vs
Intel Celeron G1620 Logo

Intel Celeron G1620

Apr 30th, 2020
Release DateDec 3rd, 2012
Core i5CollectionCeleron
Comet LakeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 1200SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores2
12
Threads2
2.9 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.7 GHz
4.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
65 WTDP
55 W
14 nm
Process Size22 nm
29.0x
Multiplier27.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i5-10400F or Celeron G1620

Control, 1920 x 1080, High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.