Buy on Amazon
€121.04
In Stock
Core i3-10300 vs Celeron G1620: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
3.7 GHz | 4-core
Buy for €121.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
2.7 GHz | 2-core
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
3.7 GHz | 4-core
Buy for €121.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
2.7 GHz | 2-core
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
17%
Price, €
€121.04
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
156
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.