Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 25% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1620 - 548 vs 439 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
439
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |