Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €35.91 vs €82.0
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 50% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1820 - 144 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
41.82282793867121%
Multi-Core
825
11.826261467889907%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |