Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €35.91 vs €90.57
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than Celeron G1820 - 197 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Buy for €90.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
34.14464534075105%
Multi-Core
825
14.345331246739699%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |