Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1227 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - €35.49 vs €167.49
- Up to 66% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 1400 - €1.48 vs €4.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 58% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1820 - 38 vs 24 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
24
63%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Buy for €167.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |