Buy on Amazon
€35.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8300 - 448 vs 444 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8300 - €35.91 vs €73.57
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
INTEL Celeron G1820 2,7GHz LGA1150 2MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz Achtkern-8M-Prozessorsockel AM3+ CPU 95 W Großpackung FX-8300
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron G1820 or FX-8300
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
1 FPS
€999/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-8300
8 GB, 500 GB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€999
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
