Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8300 - 109 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-8300 - €35.49 vs €73.57
- Up to 51% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8300 - €0.33 vs €0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |