Buy on Amazon
€35.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €35.49 vs €74.04
- Up to 44% better value when playing New World than Core i3-10105F - €0.36 vs €0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 18% better in New World than Celeron G1820 - 116 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
98
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
INTEL Celeron G1820 2,7GHz LGA1150 2MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
56%
Price, €
€74.04
47%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for €74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
