Buy on Amazon
€35.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 578 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €35.49 vs €74.94
- Up to 8% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-6600K - €0.36 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 53 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 96% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1820 - 192 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
98
51%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
INTEL Celeron G1820 2,7GHz LGA1150 2MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-6600K 3,5GHz Boxed CPU
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
