Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1602 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Athlon 3000G - 196 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €45.0 vs €69.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Rust than Athlon 3000G - €0.23 vs €0.39 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 35 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14326 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |