Key Differences
In short — Celeron 3205U outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron 3205U is 1129 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 15 vs 54 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |