Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 123 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 15 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron 3205U - 242 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |