Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 2591 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Celeron 3205U - 227 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
280
18.867924528301888%
Multi-Core
486
10.336027222458528%
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |