Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 1435 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G4900 - 555 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
555
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Chagall | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |