Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 2380 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Celeron G3900 - 235 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
214
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Chagall | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |