Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 2380 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-6100 - 555 vs 526 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
555
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
526
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |