Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1096 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-6100 - 151 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €58.54 vs €68.52
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-6100 - €0.39 vs €0.46 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
99.33774834437085%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
84.78260869565217%
Price, €
€68.52
85%
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4082 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €58.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
86.58448150833937%
Multi-Core
2336
64.94300806227412%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |