Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 508 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600 - 131 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €81.57 vs €99.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.62 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16070 minutes ago
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |