Buy on Amazon
€72.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 31 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 3200G - 255 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
253
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.43
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4,2GHz AM4 6MB Cache Wraith Spire
Buy for €72.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Rome | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using EPYC 7742 or Ryzen 3 3200G
Monster Hunter: World, 1920 x 1080, Highest
41 FPS
€17.05/FPS
Radeon RX 6400
Ryzen 3 3200G
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
