Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 3915 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-965 - 533 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 130 vs 225 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
448
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Rome | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |