Buy on Amazon
€68.52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1436 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-6100 - 198 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 51 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
176
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I3-6100 I3 6100 3,7 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 51 W CPU Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
