Buy on Amazon
€93.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 14% better in FIFA 23 than EPYC 7742 - 167 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €93.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
