Buy on Amazon
CA$564.18
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-8320 - 319 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$111.14 vs CA$564.18
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75497 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75498 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
