Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3160 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4460 - 132 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$69.99 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.18 vs CA$3.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.6/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
101
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |