Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1620 - 214 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - CA$32.99 vs CA$399.0
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.610687022900763%
Multi-Core
723
4.681126578180641%
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |