Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$36.89 vs CA$385.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-11900 - CA$0.05 vs CA$0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 27% better in Valorant than Celeron G1620 - 864 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
680
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5983 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
864
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$385
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5983 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |