Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$409.0 vs CA$560.34
- Up to 25% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.57 vs CA$0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900K - 738 vs 717 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
717
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$409
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11794 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
738
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$560.34
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$560.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 20 |
24 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |