Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3694 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - CA$32.99 vs CA$487.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 289 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75912 minutes ago
Buy for CA$487.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
14.483002832861189%
Multi-Core
723
4.318222540763304%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |