Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$36.89 vs CA$479.97
- Up to 88% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-13700F - CA$0.35 vs CA$3.0 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 52% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1620 - 160 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
105
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |