Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1668 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 1600X - 204 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - CA$141.17 vs CA$408.98
- Up to 58% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-12900K - CA$0.84 vs CA$2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$408.98
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$408.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
169
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |