Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 500 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$49.99 vs CA$358.88
- Up to 85% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.11 vs CA$0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
500
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$358.88
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$358.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
456
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |