Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2629 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$153.98 vs CA$395.9
- Up to 56% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$0.98 vs CA$2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-880 - 178 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 24 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
157
88.20224719101124%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3663 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
44.144144144144136%
Price, CA$
CA$395.9
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$395.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
44.29301533219762%
Multi-Core
1653
23.69552752293578%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |