Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4971 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$153.98 vs CA$419.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.98 vs CA$1.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 65% better in Rust than Core i7-880 - 259 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 28 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
157
60.61776061776062%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2168 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.62/FPS
60.493827160493815%
Price, CA$
CA$419
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
18.73873873873874%
Multi-Core
1653
9.537272097853682%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |