Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$153.98 vs CA$428.29
- Up to 54% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.73 vs CA$1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-880 - 270 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
210
77.77777777777779%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3821 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
270
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
45.91194968553459%
Price, CA$
CA$428.29
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$428.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
22.442813983599482%
Multi-Core
1653
16.325925925925926%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |