Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2881 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$153.98 vs CA$343.92
- Up to 53% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.67 vs CA$1.44 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-880 - 239 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
230
96.23430962343096%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4904 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
46.527777777777786%
Price, CA$
CA$343.92
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$343.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
45.13888888888889%
Multi-Core
1653
34.14583763685189%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |