Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4503 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$153.98 vs CA$278.98
- Up to 38% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13600K - CA$1.06 vs CA$1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Core i7-880 - 164 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
145
88.41463414634147%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3842 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
62.35294117647059%
Price, CA$
CA$278.98
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3852 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |