Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 135% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1620 - 209 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - CA$36.89 vs CA$248.88
- Up to 66% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-8700K - CA$0.41 vs CA$1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
89
42%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |