Buy on Amazon
CA$228.62
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320 - 352 vs 318 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$228.62 vs CA$263.71
- Up to 22% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-8320 - CA$0.65 vs CA$0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
352
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$228.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-7600K LGA 1151 Desktop Processors (BX80677I57600K)
Buy for CA$228.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Amd Fx-8320 125 Am3+ 125 16mb 3500
Buy for CA$263.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
