Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6100 - 235 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - CA$99.02 vs CA$153.92
- Up to 25% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-7600 - CA$0.49 vs CA$0.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 6 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$153.92
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
202
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |