Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$42.99 vs CA$209.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.36 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3570 - 128 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 16 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
121
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |