Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$42.99 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.26 vs CA$1.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Rust than Core i5-3570 - 207 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
163
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16070 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$388
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |