Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$216.99 vs CA$303.46
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74654 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
94.30379746835443%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
71%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
55.04241281809613%
Multi-Core
5794
70.76209086468002%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |