Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 22% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-3770K - 283 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$214.0 vs CA$319.02
- Up to 19% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.92 vs CA$1.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
283
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16515 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
232
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16514 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |