Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-875K - 262 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$112.0 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 49% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.5 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
262
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
225
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |