Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-4370 - 258 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$84.99 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 67% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.33 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
255
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |