Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-9100F - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$138.88 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 45% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.77 vs CA$1.41 per FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13382 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
181
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13382 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |