Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Core i7-6700T - 201 vs 185 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$157.96 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 34% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.85 vs CA$1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
66%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13734 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
185
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |